19

3rd Annual Meeting
September 17-18, 2019
National Library of Sweden
Stockholm, Sweden 

European BIBFRAME Workshop 2019

Presen­ta­tio­ns from the 3rd Annu­al Bibframe Works­hop in Euro­pe, September 17-18 2019

Conference Location

Kungliga biblioteket

Humlegårdsgatan 26, 102 41 Stockholm, Sweden

Original conference page

Programme

Tuesday, September 17

 Kungliga biblioteket - Humlegårdsgatan 26, 102 41 Stockholm, Sweden

Conference

Introduction
  • Leif Andresen
    Royal Danish Library
    Introduction by Leif Andresen
Session One
  • Sally H. McCallum
    Library of Congress
    Bibframe: Development and plans
  • Philip E. Schreur
    Stanford, LD4P
    Linked Data for Production (LD4P) – results and plan
  • Niklas Lindström
    National Library of Sweden
    National platform based on BIBFRAME
Session Two
  • Tiziana Possemato
    Casalini-@Cult
    Possible extensions of BIBFRAME in modelling data
  • Sally H. McCallum
    Library of Congress
    Jodi Williamschen
    Library of Congress
    RDA and BIBFRAME at the Library of Congress
  • Nancy Lorimer
    Stanford
    Jodi Williamschen
    Library of Congress
    BIBFRAME and RDA profiles
  • Fredrik Klingwall
    National Library of Sweden
    Ladda nerWorking with BIBFRAME at the National Library of Sweden
Session Three
  • Ian Bigelow
    University of Alberta
    Opus Ex Machina: Modelling SuperWork, Work, and Instance Entities in BIBFRAME
  • Jason Kovari
    Cornell
    Community-building and Extending BIBFRAME for Special Collections: the Art & Rare Material BIBFRAME Ontology Extensions and the LD4P Rare Materials Affinity Group
  • Miklós Hubay
    National Széchényi Library Hungary
    BIBFRAME Agent data from MARC authority records - is it an unnecessary redundancy?
  • Charlotte Whitt
    Index Data
    Linked Data in the Library Services Platform
Lightning talks
  • Jackie Shieh
    Smithsonian
    PCC task group application profiles for the linked data environment
  • Michalis Sfakakis
    Hellenic General Council of Libraries
    Challenges on transforming data in RDA vocabulary to BIBFRAME
Closing remarks
  • Richard Wallis
    Data Liberate
    The Relevance of BIBFRAME Beyond our Walls
  • Plenum discussion (pdf)

Wednesday, September 18

 Kungliga biblioteket - Humlegårdsgatan 26, 102 41 Stockholm, Sweden

Conference

Panel 1: Concerning Identities
We talk about a new environment in which we can expand our resources for managing identities, specially names authorities. What are the sources we would like to use? Wikidata? ISNI? NACO?

How could it work when, for example, we point to a VIAF resource, which contains 20 labels? Does an institution still have a local authority file? Would that mean that institution should host a mini-Linked Data website similar to ID.LOC.GOV or DATA.DNB.DE?

Do authority descriptions still need to follow specific rules for the construction of the authorized access point? How are the rules enforced if authorities reside outside a local system? Are service centers needed to maintain the descriptions and URIs needed for the descriptions? Would any services be free or not? Do all descriptions reside in a “local” file or do some stay at another site with links?

While machines operate on identifiers, humans require labels: How does label caching fit into the picture? Are there services that collect different files that are used instead of storing everything locally? This session is not for discussion of RWO (Real World Object) vs. identifiers vs. labels for names. The real issue is working in a communal environment.
  • Tiziana Possemato
    Casalini-@Cult
    The Cluster Knowledge Base approach to identities management
  • Kevin Ford
    Library of Congress
    Identities for hubs, providers, and other things
  • Niklas Lindström
    National Library of Sweden
    Identies are elusive. "Authorities" are organizational points of view, linked together in a mesh of agreements. (Prefer borrowing over defining.)
Panel 2: Concerning Changes
In the current environment, we have different ways to supply and apply changes to a description of a resource. How could that translate to an RDF/triplestore environment? Do we need to signal that we have made a change to a description that is used by others? If so, what strategies exist or might we consider to communicate changes to downstream consumers?

Do we need to show provenance for triples in our local or shared systems? Could recording who made a change become challenging for the triple/statement? Are there changes that are tracked locally and other changes that are shared?

What types of changes require notification, such as changes to labels, or the addition/removal of subjects, or simply whenever the resource changes? Will local systems and local practices need to be modified?
  • Nate Trail
    Library of Congress
    Graph based approach to changes
  • Tiziana Possemato
    Casalini-@Cult
    Use case implications for change
  • Niklas Lindström
    National Library of Swedent
    Named graphs as Documents, tracking sources and derivations. (Future work on WebSub and notifications.)
Panel 3: Concerning Infrastructure
To support RDF/Linked data we need infrastructures that supply descriptions and URIs. For example, the Library of Congress has built http://id.loc.gov into a source of data to assist with the addition of URIs in our BIBFRAME database, and to support lookups and other aides for description creation. While LC has made ID accessible to others, we expect any institution or network will need its own version of such tools to support both description creation and retrieval. How are others handling this infrastructure need?
  • Jeremy Nelson
    Stanford University Libraries
    Running the Sinopia Stack on Amazon Web Services
  • Nate Trail
    Library of Congress
    How ID, BIBFRAME editor, and BIBFRAME database work together
  • Osma Suominen
    National Library of Finland
    Finto service for controlled vocabularies as a component of Linked Data kataloging
  • Niklas Lindström
    National Library of Sweden
    Just JSON inside, governed by RDF rules and Linked Data interfaces. Map and cache
Panel 4: Concerning Relationships
Relationships are the cornerstone of the new environment. Within an institution or network, how are they handled? How are relationships between resources inside and outside the institution treated? Do other institutions see the need for over-arching gathering devices like Hubs (Library of Congress) or Superworks (Casalini)? What are the key components of this linking?

What are the challenges of converting legacy data from MARC to BIBFRAME and (potentially) back to MARC?
  • Nancy Lorimer
    Stanford University
    Events & Works & Relationships in Performed Music
  • Kevin Ford
    Library of Congress
    Hubs and managing relationships
  • Tiziana Possemato
    Casalini-@Cult
    SuperWorks, MasterInstance and relationships
  • Fredrik Klingwall
    National Library of Sweden
    Extensions for past and future relationships
Panel 5: Concerning Editors
Editors for creating and modifying Bibframe descriptions are a major development needed for movement to a BIBFRAME environment. What additional features in this new environment will assist catalogers with their ability to efficiently, yet richly, describe library resources?

Must we edit RDF-resource-by-RDF-resource, which may be inefficient for catalogers, or can we edit by RDF graph, which is technologically more challenging? If by graph, what are the challenges of scoping the graph we load into an editor and how we save it back, i.e. deleting/replacing the edited graph?

What is the best use of profiles? What do you do with descriptive elements (triples) belonging to a graph that do not match your edit profile? What are the complications of editing a description that started as MARC and therefore has no explicit profile?
  • Jeremy Nelson
    Stanford University Libraries
    Sidestepping the graph - Sinopia Linked Data Editor's approach for editing RDF
  • Niklas Lindström
    National Library of Sweden
    Editing named graphes as JSON-LD using an application ontology, lenses and two kinds of bnodes.
  • Jodi Williaschen
    Library of Congress
    Deciding what to edit
Closing Session
  • Leif Andresen
    Royal Danish Library
    Closing remarks and goodbye (including group photo)

Proceedings

Listed in order of program schedule

Organizer

Leif Andresen, Royal Danish Library (Spokesperson)
Michele Casalini, Casalini Libri and Share-VDE
Reinhold Heuvelmann, German National Library
Sally H. McCallum, Library of Congress - NDMSO
Philip E. Schreur, Stanford University and LD4P
Osma Suominen, National Library of Finland
Harriet Aagaard, National Library of Sweden
Miklós Lendvay, National Széchényi Library of Hungary